CVE-2021-42059: InsydeH2O: UEFI firmware stack overflow enables RCE
UNKNOWNThis is a stack-based buffer overflow in the DisplayTypeDxe DXE driver of Insyde's InsydeH2O UEFI firmware, used as the BIOS/UEFI base by numerous OEMs (NetApp and Siemens have issued their own advisories referencing this exact issue). It is not an AI/ML-specific vulnerability — the 'ml_library' tagging on this CVE appears to be a classification error, since the flaw sits entirely at the firmware layer, below the OS and any AI/ML stack. The practical risk is low right now: EPSS is 0.35% (72nd percentile, meaning most scored CVEs sit even lower, but the absolute exploitation probability is small), it is not in CISA KEV, and there is no public exploit or Nuclei template. The real concern for a CISO is scope of exposure — firmware-level RCE is high-impact and can survive OS reimaging — on any physical host running affected InsydeH2O versions, including servers hosting training clusters or edge AI inference devices. Action: inventory devices for InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0-5.4 below the patched builds (05.08.41, 05.16.41, 05.26.41, 05.35.41, 05.42.20) via your OEM's advisory (Insyde SA-2022006), and apply vendor BIOS/UEFI updates through normal patch management — this does not warrant AI-specific incident response.
What is the risk?
Low near-term exploitation likelihood: EPSS 0.35% (72nd percentile), no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit code, and no scanner/Nuclei template available. However, the underlying vulnerability class (firmware-level stack overflow leading to arbitrary code execution) is high-severity by nature — UEFI/DXE-level compromise typically requires local/physical access or a compromised update mechanism, but grants persistence beneath the OS, defeating most endpoint security tooling and surviving reinstalls. Exposure is a function of whether affected InsydeH2O-based hardware (servers, workstations, edge devices) is in the environment, not of any AI/ML software choice.
How does the attack unfold?
What systems are affected?
| Package | Ecosystem | Vulnerable Range | Patched |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | — | — | No patch |
Do you use n/a? You're affected.
How severe is it?
What should I do?
1 step1) Inventory hardware/firmware versions across data center and edge fleets to identify InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0-5.4 builds prior to 05.08.41/05.16.41/05.26.41/05.35.41/05.42.20. 2) Obtain and apply the OEM-specific BIOS/UEFI update referencing Insyde advisory SA-2022006 (check NetApp and Siemens advisories if using their hardware). 3) Prioritize patching for AI training/inference hosts and edge devices where firmware compromise would be hardest to detect and most damaging to data/model integrity. 4) Restrict physical and low-level administrative access to hosts pending patching, since exploitation of DXE drivers typically requires local or privileged access. 5) No AI-specific detection is applicable — treat as standard firmware patch management.
How is it classified?
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
This CVE is relevant to:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2021-42059?
This is a stack-based buffer overflow in the DisplayTypeDxe DXE driver of Insyde's InsydeH2O UEFI firmware, used as the BIOS/UEFI base by numerous OEMs (NetApp and Siemens have issued their own advisories referencing this exact issue). It is not an AI/ML-specific vulnerability — the 'ml_library' tagging on this CVE appears to be a classification error, since the flaw sits entirely at the firmware layer, below the OS and any AI/ML stack. The practical risk is low right now: EPSS is 0.35% (72nd percentile, meaning most scored CVEs sit even lower, but the absolute exploitation probability is small), it is not in CISA KEV, and there is no public exploit or Nuclei template. The real concern for a CISO is scope of exposure — firmware-level RCE is high-impact and can survive OS reimaging — on any physical host running affected InsydeH2O versions, including servers hosting training clusters or edge AI inference devices. Action: inventory devices for InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0-5.4 below the patched builds (05.08.41, 05.16.41, 05.26.41, 05.35.41, 05.42.20) via your OEM's advisory (Insyde SA-2022006), and apply vendor BIOS/UEFI updates through normal patch management — this does not warrant AI-specific incident response.
Is CVE-2021-42059 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2021-42059 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2021-42059?
1) Inventory hardware/firmware versions across data center and edge fleets to identify InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0-5.4 builds prior to 05.08.41/05.16.41/05.26.41/05.35.41/05.42.20. 2) Obtain and apply the OEM-specific BIOS/UEFI update referencing Insyde advisory SA-2022006 (check NetApp and Siemens advisories if using their hardware). 3) Prioritize patching for AI training/inference hosts and edge devices where firmware compromise would be hardest to detect and most damaging to data/model integrity. 4) Restrict physical and low-level administrative access to hosts pending patching, since exploitation of DXE drivers typically requires local or privileged access. 5) No AI-specific detection is applicable — treat as standard firmware patch management.
What systems are affected by CVE-2021-42059?
This vulnerability affects the following AI/ML architecture patterns: training pipelines, model serving.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2021-42059?
No CVSS score has been assigned yet.
What is the AI security impact?
Affected AI Architectures
Compliance Controls Affected
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0 before 05.08.41, Kernel 5.1 before 05.16.41, Kernel 5.2 before 05.26.41, Kernel 5.3 before 05.35.41, and Kernel 5.4 before 05.42.20. A stack-based buffer overflow leads toarbitrary code execution in UEFI DisplayTypeDxe DXE driver.
Exploitation Scenario
An adversary with local administrative access, physical access, or the ability to deliver a malicious firmware/BIOS update to a target machine triggers the stack-based buffer overflow in the DisplayTypeDxe DXE driver during boot, achieving arbitrary code execution at the UEFI firmware level before the OS or any security agent loads. On an AI training server or edge inference appliance, this would let the attacker implant firmware-level persistence that survives OS reinstalls, potentially enabling later tampering with model files, training data pipelines, or credentials used to access ML infrastructure — but the attack itself exploits firmware, not any AI component.
References
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-306654.pdfx_refsource_CONFIRM
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220216-0008/x_refsource_CONFIRM
- insyde.com/security-pledgex_refsource_MISC
- insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2022006x_refsource_MISC
Timeline
Related Vulnerabilities
CVE-2024-291210.0BentoML: RCE via insecure deserialization (CVSS 10)
Same attack type: Code ExecutionCVE-2026-2185810.0n8n: Input Validation flaw enables exploitation
Same attack type: Code ExecutionCVE-2025-512010.0smolagents: sandbox escape enables unauthenticated RCE
Same attack type: Code ExecutionCVE-2025-5952810.0Flowise: Unauthenticated RCE via MCP config injection
Same attack type: Code ExecutionGHSA-vvpj-8cmc-gx3910.0picklescan: security flaw enables exploitation
Same attack type: Code Execution