AI Threat Alert
CVE-2026-14630
LOWA vulnerability has been found in ForceInjection AI-fundermentals 2.0/3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_conversation_history of the file 08_agentic_system/memory/langchain/code/smart_customer_service.py of the component Memory Recall Handler. The manipulation leads to use of...
Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.
What systems are affected?
| Package | Ecosystem | Vulnerable Range | Patched |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-fundermentals | — | — | No patch |
Do you use AI-fundermentals? You're affected.
How severe is it?
What is the attack surface?
What should I do?
No patch available
Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-14630?
A vulnerability has been found in ForceInjection AI-fundermentals 2.0/3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_conversation_history of the file 08_agentic_system/memory/langchain/code/smart_customer_service.py of the component Memory Recall Handler. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is f57277fdd9ba373ace72d83c272023ec67f720d6. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue. The project confirms (translated from Chinese): "We now require session ownership verification in methods such as `username`, `sessionowner`, etc., and we've chat()changed the generation of `sessionowner` to include verified user identity and security context metadata."
Is CVE-2026-14630 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-14630 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2026-14630?
No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-14630?
CVE-2026-14630 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 3.1 (LOW).
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
A vulnerability has been found in ForceInjection AI-fundermentals 2.0/3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_conversation_history of the file 08_agentic_system/memory/langchain/code/smart_customer_service.py of the component Memory Recall Handler. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is f57277fdd9ba373ace72d83c272023ec67f720d6. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue. The project confirms (translated from Chinese): "We now require session ownership verification in methods such as `username`, `sessionowner`, etc., and we've chat()changed the generation of `sessionowner` to include verified user identity and security context metadata."
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-327 — Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm: The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.
- [Architecture and Design] When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis. For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192]. Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak. Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267
- [Architecture and Design] Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.
Source: MITRE CWE corpus.
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C References
- github.com/ForceInjection/AI-fundamentals/commit/f57277fdd9ba373ace72d83c272023ec67f720d6 patch
- github.com/ForceInjection/AI-fundamentals/issues/17 exploit issue-tracking
- github.com/ForceInjection/AI-fundamentals/pull/18 issue-tracking patch
- vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14630 third-party-advisory
- vuldb.com/submit/845672 third-party-advisory
- vuldb.com/vuln/376146 vdb-entry technical-description
- vuldb.com/vuln/376146/cti signature permissions-required