CVE-2026-15605

LOW
Published July 13, 2026

A security vulnerability has been detected in wandb 0.25.2.dev1. Affected is the function ArtifactManifestEntry.download in the library wandb/sdk/lib/hashutil.py of the component Artifact Integrity Validation. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. The attack may be initiated remotely. A high...

Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.

How severe is it?

CVSS 3.1
3.1 / 10
EPSS
N/A
Exploitation Status
No known exploitation
Sophistication
N/A

What is the attack surface?

AV AC PR UI S C I A
AV Network
AC High
PR Low
UI None
S Unchanged
C Low
I None
A None

What should I do?

No patch available

Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.

Which compliance frameworks are affected?

Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-15605?

A security vulnerability has been detected in wandb 0.25.2.dev1. Affected is the function ArtifactManifestEntry.download in the library wandb/sdk/lib/hashutil.py of the component Artifact Integrity Validation. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. The attack may be initiated remotely. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

Is CVE-2026-15605 actively exploited?

No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-15605 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.

How to fix CVE-2026-15605?

No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-15605?

CVE-2026-15605 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 3.1 (LOW).

What are the technical details?

Original Advisory

A security vulnerability has been detected in wandb 0.25.2.dev1. Affected is the function ArtifactManifestEntry.download in the library wandb/sdk/lib/hashutil.py of the component Artifact Integrity Validation. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. The attack may be initiated remotely. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-327 — Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm: The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.

  • [Architecture and Design] When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis. For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192]. Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak. Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267
  • [Architecture and Design] Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.

Source: MITRE CWE corpus.

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Timeline

Published
July 13, 2026
Last Modified
July 13, 2026
First Seen
July 13, 2026