CVE-2026-44338

### Summary PraisonAI ships a legacy Flask API server with authentication disabled by default. When that server is used, any caller that can reach it can access `/agents` and trigger the configured `agents.yaml` workflow through `/chat` without providing a token. ### Details The vulnerable server is the shipped `src/praisonai/api_server.py` entrypoint. - `AUTH_ENABLED = False` and `AUTH_TOKEN = None` are hard-coded at [[src/praisonai/api_server.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:15)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:15). - `check_auth()` returns `True` whenever authentication is disabled, so both protected routes fail open by design at [[src/praisonai/api_server.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:18)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:18). - `POST /chat` only checks that the request JSON contains a `message` key and then runs `PraisonAI(agent_file="agents.yaml").run()` at [[src/praisonai/api_server.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:31)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:31). - `GET /agents` is guarded by the same no-op authentication check and returns agent metadata at [[src/praisonai/api_server.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:55)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/[src/praisonai/api_server.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:66):55). - When launched directly, the same script binds to `0.0.0.0:8080` at [src/praisonai/api_server.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/api_server.py:66). The deploy subsystem keeps the same insecure authentication default: - `APIConfig` defaults `auth_enabled` to `False` in [[src/praisonai/praisonai/deploy/models.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/deploy/models.py:23)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/deploy/models.py:23). - The generated sample API deployment YAML recommends `host: 0.0.0.0` together with `auth_enabled: false` in [[src/praisonai/praisonai/deploy/schema.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/deploy/schema.py:108)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/deploy/schema.py:108). For scope clarity: the newer `serve agents` command is safer by default, because it binds to `127.0.0.1` and supports `--api-key` in [[src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py](https://github.com/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py:155)](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py:155). This report is about the shipped legacy API server and the generated/sample API deployment path above. Version scope: - `v2.5.6` already ships the same `src/praisonai/api_server.py` implementation. - The current PyPI release on May 1, 2026 is `4.6.33`, and it still ships the same unauthenticated server logic. ### PoC The following route-level reproduction was verified locally and proves that the shipped `api_server.py` exposes `/agents` and `/chat` without authentication. 1. From the repository root, create a throwaway environment with the server's direct Flask dependencies: ```bash python3 -m venv /tmp/praisonai-ghsa-venv /tmp/praisonai-ghsa-venv/bin/pip install flask flask-cors ``` 2. Execute the shipped `src/praisonai/api_server.py` under a minimal stub for `praisonai.PraisonAI` so only the server auth logic is exercised: ```bash /tmp/praisonai-ghsa-venv/bin/python - <<'PY' import importlib.util import pathlib import sys import types stub = types.ModuleType("praisonai") class DummyPraisonAI: def __init__(self, agent_file="agents.yaml"): self.agent_file = agent_file def run(self): return {"ran": True, "agent_file": self.agent_file} stub.PraisonAI = DummyPraisonAI sys.modules["praisonai"] = stub path = pathlib.Path("src/praisonai/api_server.py").resolve() spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("api_server_local", path) mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec) spec.loader.exec_module(mod) client = mod.app.test_client() print(client.get("/agents").status_code, client.get("/agents").get_data(as_text=True)) print(client.post("/chat", json={"message": "hello"}).status_code, client.post("/chat", json={"message": "hello"}).get_data(as_text=True)) PY ``` 3. Observed result: ```text 200 {"agent_file":"agents.yaml","agents":["default"]} 200 {"response":{"agent_file":"agents.yaml","ran":true},"status":"success"} ``` Both endpoints succeed without any `Authorization` header. ### Impact Any reachable caller can invoke the legacy API server's protected functionality without a token. At minimum, this allows: - unauthenticated enumeration of the configured agent file through `/agents` - unauthenticated triggering of the locally configured `agents.yaml` workflow through `/chat` - repeated consumption of model/API quota and any other side effects performed by that workflow - exposure of whatever result `PraisonAI.run()` returns to the unauthenticated caller This is not the same as arbitrary prompt injection by itself, because the current `/chat` handler ignores the submitted `message` value and simply runs the configured workflow. The impact therefore depends on what the operator's `agents.yaml` is allowed to do, but the authentication bypass is unconditional in the shipped legacy server.