CVE-2026-53824: OpenClaw: stale slash tokens bypass revocation controls
MEDIUMOpenClaw before 2026.4.24 fails to immediately enforce token revocation for slash commands, leaving a window where attackers whose credentials have been revoked can continue invoking agent commands until the monitor refreshes its state. In AI agent deployments this matters beyond a standard auth bypass: the post-revocation execution window means a terminated employee or compromised account can trigger tool invocations — data queries, file operations, pipeline calls — even after an administrator believes access has been cut. CVSS rates integrity impact as High with low attack complexity and no user interaction required, meaning any ex-holder of a valid token can exploit this without special knowledge. No public exploit or KEV listing indicates no observed in-the-wild exploitation today, but the low bar to exploit makes patching time-sensitive. Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.4.24 immediately; as an interim control, force-rotate all slash tokens and audit command logs for executions timestamped after revocation events.
What is the risk?
Medium overall, elevated for organizations with AI agent deployments where slash commands trigger sensitive operations. CVSS 6.5 reflects network-accessible exploitation requiring only low privileges — any previously-authorized user can exploit the revocation lag. The refresh window duration is unspecified but likely seconds to minutes, making real-time exploitation feasible for a motivated insider or compromised-account scenario. No KEV listing and unavailable EPSS data suggest no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. The 175 other CVEs in the same package signal a historically vulnerability-prone codebase warranting elevated scrutiny beyond this individual finding.
How does the attack unfold?
What systems are affected?
| Package | Ecosystem | Vulnerable Range | Patched |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenClaw | pip | — | No patch |
Do you use OpenClaw? You're affected.
How severe is it?
What is the attack surface?
What should I do?
5 steps-
Patch to OpenClaw 2026.4.24 or later immediately.
-
If patching is not immediately possible, force-rotate all active slash tokens to reset acceptance windows and invalidate any currently exploitable stale tokens.
-
Audit command execution logs for entries timestamped after token revocation events — any such entries indicate exploitation or an abnormally long refresh window.
-
Implement network-level controls to block OpenClaw command endpoints for revoked-user source IPs as defense-in-depth.
-
Review operator configuration for sensitive slash commands and enforce least-privilege token scoping to limit blast radius if the vulnerability is triggered.
How is it classified?
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
This CVE is relevant to:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-53824?
OpenClaw before 2026.4.24 fails to immediately enforce token revocation for slash commands, leaving a window where attackers whose credentials have been revoked can continue invoking agent commands until the monitor refreshes its state. In AI agent deployments this matters beyond a standard auth bypass: the post-revocation execution window means a terminated employee or compromised account can trigger tool invocations — data queries, file operations, pipeline calls — even after an administrator believes access has been cut. CVSS rates integrity impact as High with low attack complexity and no user interaction required, meaning any ex-holder of a valid token can exploit this without special knowledge. No public exploit or KEV listing indicates no observed in-the-wild exploitation today, but the low bar to exploit makes patching time-sensitive. Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.4.24 immediately; as an interim control, force-rotate all slash tokens and audit command logs for executions timestamped after revocation events.
Is CVE-2026-53824 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-53824 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2026-53824?
1. Patch to OpenClaw 2026.4.24 or later immediately. 2. If patching is not immediately possible, force-rotate all active slash tokens to reset acceptance windows and invalidate any currently exploitable stale tokens. 3. Audit command execution logs for entries timestamped after token revocation events — any such entries indicate exploitation or an abnormally long refresh window. 4. Implement network-level controls to block OpenClaw command endpoints for revoked-user source IPs as defense-in-depth. 5. Review operator configuration for sensitive slash commands and enforce least-privilege token scoping to limit blast radius if the vulnerability is triggered.
What systems are affected by CVE-2026-53824?
This vulnerability affects the following AI/ML architecture patterns: AI agent frameworks, slash command integrations, enterprise AI assistant platforms, human-in-the-loop agent pipelines.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-53824?
CVE-2026-53824 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (MEDIUM).
What is the AI security impact?
Affected AI Architectures
MITRE ATLAS Techniques
AML.T0012 Valid Accounts AML.T0053 AI Agent Tool Invocation AML.T0091.000 Application Access Token AML.T0107 Exploitation for Defense Evasion Compliance Controls Affected
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
OpenClaw before 2026.4.24 contains a token revocation vulnerability allowing callers with revoked slash tokens to continue executing commands during monitor refresh windows. Attackers can exploit stale token acceptance to invoke slash command behavior briefly after token revocation, potentially executing unauthorized actions depending on operator configuration.
Exploitation Scenario
A recently-terminated employee whose OpenClaw slash token was revoked by an administrator immediately begins sending slash commands to the organization's AI agent deployment. Because the monitor has not yet refreshed its revocation state — likely a configurable interval — commands are accepted and executed as if the token were still valid. In a real AI agent context this could trigger tool invocations such as exporting conversation histories, querying internal knowledge bases, or initiating automated pipeline tasks, all completing before the monitor refresh fires and the token is rejected. If the refresh interval is predictable or observable, the attacker can time repeated exploitation windows precisely.
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-613 — Insufficient Session Expiration: According to WASC, "Insufficient Session Expiration is when a web site permits an attacker to reuse old session credentials or session IDs for authorization."
- [Implementation] Set sessions/credentials expiration date.
Source: MITRE CWE corpus.
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N References
Timeline
Related Vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-30741 9.8 OpenClaw: RCE via request-side prompt injection
Same package: openclaw CVE-2026-28451 9.3 OpenClaw: SSRF via Feishu extension exposes internal services
Same package: openclaw GHSA-cwj3-vqpp-pmxr 8.8 openclaw: Model bypasses authz to persist unsafe config
Same package: openclaw CVE-2026-35674 8.8 OpenClaw: scope bypass enables full agent admin takeover
Same package: openclaw CVE-2026-53811 8.8 OpenClaw: privilege escalation via identity spoofing
Same package: openclaw