CVE-2026-55445

GHSA-v667-gc2r-2xm7 CRITICAL
Published August 20, 2026

### Summary The init guard middleware in Qinglong only checks `/api/user/init` paths but not `/open/user/init`, which is whitelisted from JWT authentication and rewritten to `/api/user/init` after the guard has already passed, allowing unauthenticated admin credential reset on initialized...

Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.

What systems are affected?

Package Ecosystem Vulnerable Range Patched
Panel npm < 2.20.1 2.20.1
5.7K OpenSSF 6.8 499 dependents Pushed 6d ago 66% patched ~13d to patch Full package profile →

Do you use Panel? You're affected.

How severe is it?

CVSS 3.1
N/A
EPSS
0.4%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
Higher than 34% of all CVEs
Exploitation Status
No known exploitation
Sophistication
N/A

What should I do?

Patch available

Update Panel to version 2.20.1

Which compliance frameworks are affected?

Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-55445?

### Summary The init guard middleware in Qinglong only checks `/api/user/init` paths but not `/open/user/init`, which is whitelisted from JWT authentication and rewritten to `/api/user/init` after the guard has already passed, allowing unauthenticated admin credential reset on initialized instances. ### Affected Package - **Ecosystem:** npm - **Package:** whyour/qinglong - **Affected versions:** < 6bec52dca158 - **Patched versions:** >= 6bec52dca158 ### Severity Medium ### CWE CWE-287 — Improper Authentication ### Details The Qinglong panel has an initialization endpoint (`/api/user/init`) that allows setting admin credentials. Once the system is initialized, an init guard middleware is supposed to block further calls. The middleware in `back/loaders/express.ts` only checks: ```javascript !['/api/user/init', '/api/user/notification/init'].includes(pathLower) ``` However, the application also has a URL rewrite rule: `rewrite('/open/*', '/api/$1')`. The `/open/*` paths are whitelisted from JWT authentication. The middleware ordering creates the bypass: first, JWT auth sees `/open/*` paths match the whitelist regex and skips authentication. Second, the init guard only checks for `/api/user/init` -- `/open/user/init` passes through as "not an init path". Third, the URL rewrite transforms `/open/user/init` to `/api/user/init` after the guard has already passed. This means an unauthenticated attacker can send `PUT /open/user/init` with new credentials to reset the admin account on any Qinglong panel instance, gaining full administrative access. ### PoC ```javascript /** * CVE-2026-3965 - Qinglong Panel /open/user/init Auth Bypass * * The init guard middleware only checks /api/user/init paths. * But /open/user/init is whitelisted from JWT auth and rewritten * to /api/user/init via express-urlrewrite AFTER the guard. */ "use strict"; // Simulate the init guard middleware exactly as in the source function initGuardMiddleware(reqPath, authInfo) { const pathLower = reqPath.toLowerCase(); // Exact check from the vulnerable source if (!['/api/user/init', '/api/user/notification/init'].includes(pathLower)) { return { action: "next" }; // passes through } let isInitialized = true; if ( Object.keys(authInfo).length === 2 && authInfo.username === 'admin' && authInfo.password === 'admin' ) { isInitialized = false; } if (isInitialized) { return { action: "block", code: 450, message: "Error" }; } else { return { action: "next" }; } } const authInfo = { username: "realAdmin", password: "str0ngP@ss!" }; console.log("System state: initialized (non-default credentials)"); // Test 1: Direct /api/user/init is blocked const test1 = initGuardMiddleware("/api/user/init", authInfo); console.log("\n[Test 1] PUT /api/user/init:"); console.log(" Guard result:", test1.action); console.log(" Blocked:", test1.action === "block"); // Test 2: /open/user/init BYPASSES init guard const test2 = initGuardMiddleware("/open/user/init", authInfo); console.log("\n[Test 2] PUT /open/user/init:"); console.log(" Guard result:", test2.action); console.log(" Bypassed guard:", test2.action === "next"); if (test2.action === "next") { const rewrittenPath = "/open/user/init".replace(/^\/open\//, "/api/"); console.log(" After rewrite:", rewrittenPath); console.log(" Reaches init handler: true"); } if (test1.action === "block" && test2.action === "next") { console.log("\nVULNERABILITY CONFIRMED: /open/user/init bypasses the init guard"); console.log("An attacker can reset admin credentials on an initialized instance."); process.exit(0); } else { console.log("\nVULNERABILITY NOT CONFIRMED"); process.exit(1); } ``` **Steps to reproduce:** 1. `git clone https://github.com/whyour/qinglong /tmp/qinglong_test` 2. `cd /tmp/qinglong_test && git checkout 6bec52dc~1` 3. `node poc.js` **Expected output:** ``` VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED /open/user/init bypasses the init guard; the guard only checks /api/user/init but /open/ path is whitelisted and rewritten after. ``` ### Impact An unauthenticated attacker can send `PUT /open/user/init` with new credentials to reset the admin account on any Qinglong panel instance. This provides full administrative access, enabling the attacker to execute arbitrary cron jobs and scripts on the server. ### Suggested Remediation Add `/open/user/init` and `/open/user/notification/init` to the init guard check list. Alternatively, move the URL rewrite middleware to run before the init guard. Consider implementing the init guard at the handler level rather than as path-based middleware. ### References - Incomplete fix commit: https://github.com/whyour/qinglong/commit/6bec52dca158481258315ba0fc2f11206df7b719 - Original CVE: CVE-2026-3965

Is CVE-2026-55445 actively exploited?

No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-55445 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.

How to fix CVE-2026-55445?

Update to patched version: Panel 2.20.1.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-55445?

No CVSS score has been assigned yet.

What are the technical details?

Original Advisory

### Summary The init guard middleware in Qinglong only checks `/api/user/init` paths but not `/open/user/init`, which is whitelisted from JWT authentication and rewritten to `/api/user/init` after the guard has already passed, allowing unauthenticated admin credential reset on initialized instances. ### Affected Package - **Ecosystem:** npm - **Package:** whyour/qinglong - **Affected versions:** < 6bec52dca158 - **Patched versions:** >= 6bec52dca158 ### Severity Medium ### CWE CWE-287 — Improper Authentication ### Details The Qinglong panel has an initialization endpoint (`/api/user/init`) that allows setting admin credentials. Once the system is initialized, an init guard middleware is supposed to block further calls. The middleware in `back/loaders/express.ts` only checks: ```javascript !['/api/user/init', '/api/user/notification/init'].includes(pathLower) ``` However, the application also has a URL rewrite rule: `rewrite('/open/*', '/api/$1')`. The `/open/*` paths are whitelisted from JWT authentication. The middleware ordering creates the bypass: first, JWT auth sees `/open/*` paths match the whitelist regex and skips authentication. Second, the init guard only checks for `/api/user/init` -- `/open/user/init` passes through as "not an init path". Third, the URL rewrite transforms `/open/user/init` to `/api/user/init` after the guard has already passed. This means an unauthenticated attacker can send `PUT /open/user/init` with new credentials to reset the admin account on any Qinglong panel instance, gaining full administrative access. ### PoC ```javascript /** * CVE-2026-3965 - Qinglong Panel /open/user/init Auth Bypass * * The init guard middleware only checks /api/user/init paths. * But /open/user/init is whitelisted from JWT auth and rewritten * to /api/user/init via express-urlrewrite AFTER the guard. */ "use strict"; // Simulate the init guard middleware exactly as in the source function initGuardMiddleware(reqPath, authInfo) { const pathLower = reqPath.toLowerCase(); // Exact check from the vulnerable source if (!['/api/user/init', '/api/user/notification/init'].includes(pathLower)) { return { action: "next" }; // passes through } let isInitialized = true; if ( Object.keys(authInfo).length === 2 && authInfo.username === 'admin' && authInfo.password === 'admin' ) { isInitialized = false; } if (isInitialized) { return { action: "block", code: 450, message: "Error" }; } else { return { action: "next" }; } } const authInfo = { username: "realAdmin", password: "str0ngP@ss!" }; console.log("System state: initialized (non-default credentials)"); // Test 1: Direct /api/user/init is blocked const test1 = initGuardMiddleware("/api/user/init", authInfo); console.log("\n[Test 1] PUT /api/user/init:"); console.log(" Guard result:", test1.action); console.log(" Blocked:", test1.action === "block"); // Test 2: /open/user/init BYPASSES init guard const test2 = initGuardMiddleware("/open/user/init", authInfo); console.log("\n[Test 2] PUT /open/user/init:"); console.log(" Guard result:", test2.action); console.log(" Bypassed guard:", test2.action === "next"); if (test2.action === "next") { const rewrittenPath = "/open/user/init".replace(/^\/open\//, "/api/"); console.log(" After rewrite:", rewrittenPath); console.log(" Reaches init handler: true"); } if (test1.action === "block" && test2.action === "next") { console.log("\nVULNERABILITY CONFIRMED: /open/user/init bypasses the init guard"); console.log("An attacker can reset admin credentials on an initialized instance."); process.exit(0); } else { console.log("\nVULNERABILITY NOT CONFIRMED"); process.exit(1); } ``` **Steps to reproduce:** 1. `git clone https://github.com/whyour/qinglong /tmp/qinglong_test` 2. `cd /tmp/qinglong_test && git checkout 6bec52dc~1` 3. `node poc.js` **Expected output:** ``` VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED /open/user/init bypasses the init guard; the guard only checks /api/user/init but /open/ path is whitelisted and rewritten after. ``` ### Impact An unauthenticated attacker can send `PUT /open/user/init` with new credentials to reset the admin account on any Qinglong panel instance. This provides full administrative access, enabling the attacker to execute arbitrary cron jobs and scripts on the server. ### Suggested Remediation Add `/open/user/init` and `/open/user/notification/init` to the init guard check list. Alternatively, move the URL rewrite middleware to run before the init guard. Consider implementing the init guard at the handler level rather than as path-based middleware. ### References - Incomplete fix commit: https://github.com/whyour/qinglong/commit/6bec52dca158481258315ba0fc2f11206df7b719 - Original CVE: CVE-2026-3965

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-287 — Improper Authentication: When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.

  • [Architecture and Design] Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.

Source: MITRE CWE corpus.

Timeline

Published
August 20, 2026
Last Modified
August 20, 2026
First Seen
August 20, 2026

Related Vulnerabilities