AI Threat Alert
CVE-2026-65956
AWAITING NVDKubePi is a Kubernetes multi-cluster management panel. In versions up to and including 1.6.15, the SSO configuration API endpoints are exposed on the same public routing boundary as the SSO login and callback endpoints, so SSO, OIDC, and SAML management operations can be reached without...
Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.
How severe is it?
What should I do?
No patch available
Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-65956?
KubePi is a Kubernetes multi-cluster management panel. In versions up to and including 1.6.15, the SSO configuration API endpoints are exposed on the same public routing boundary as the SSO login and callback endpoints, so SSO, OIDC, and SAML management operations can be reached without administrator authorization. Because reading, creating, and updating the global SSO configuration is not restricted to administrators, an unauthorized or low-privileged user can inspect or alter the authentication configuration, which under certain conditions can lead to account takeover or privilege escalation. The SSO connectivity-test function can additionally be abused as a server-side request forgery primitive, and the user list API returns user objects without consistently clearing authentication-related fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0.
Is CVE-2026-65956 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-65956 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2026-65956?
No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-65956?
No CVSS score has been assigned yet.
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
KubePi is a Kubernetes multi-cluster management panel. In versions up to and including 1.6.15, the SSO configuration API endpoints are exposed on the same public routing boundary as the SSO login and callback endpoints, so SSO, OIDC, and SAML management operations can be reached without administrator authorization. Because reading, creating, and updating the global SSO configuration is not restricted to administrators, an unauthorized or low-privileged user can inspect or alter the authentication configuration, which under certain conditions can lead to account takeover or privilege escalation. The SSO connectivity-test function can additionally be abused as a server-side request forgery primitive, and the user list API returns user objects without consistently clearing authentication-related fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0.
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-306 — Missing Authentication for Critical Function: The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
- [Architecture and Design] Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate
- [Architecture and Design] For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Source: MITRE CWE corpus.