AI Threat Alert
CVE-2026-69262
HIGHFlowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, `DELETE /api/v1/chatflows/:id` authorized requests with checkAnyPermission('chatflows:delete,agentflows:delete'), so possession of either permission was sufficient to reach the delete path. The...
Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.
How severe is it?
What should I do?
No patch available
Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-69262?
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, `DELETE /api/v1/chatflows/:id` authorized requests with checkAnyPermission('chatflows:delete,agentflows:delete'), so possession of either permission was sufficient to reach the delete path. The delete logic then resolved the target record only by id and workspaceId and did not validate the target resource type, allowing a caller with only agentflows:delete to delete a CHATFLOW and a caller with only chatflows:delete to delete an AGENTFLOW in the same workspace. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.
Is CVE-2026-69262 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-69262 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2026-69262?
No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-69262?
No CVSS score has been assigned yet.
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, `DELETE /api/v1/chatflows/:id` authorized requests with checkAnyPermission('chatflows:delete,agentflows:delete'), so possession of either permission was sufficient to reach the delete path. The delete logic then resolved the target record only by id and workspaceId and did not validate the target resource type, allowing a caller with only agentflows:delete to delete a CHATFLOW and a caller with only chatflows:delete to delete an AGENTFLOW in the same workspace. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-863 — Incorrect Authorization: The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
- [Architecture and Design] Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- [Architecture and Design] Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Source: MITRE CWE corpus.