CVE-2026-92983

HIGH
Published September 17, 2026

InternLM LMDeploy through 0.17.0 in DistServe prefill/decode disaggregation mode fails to release scheduler sessions because the proxy uses user-facing session IDs instead of internal scheduler keys. Unauthenticated attackers can send completion requests to the proxy endpoint that accumulate...

Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.

How severe is it?

CVSS 3.1
7.5 / 10
EPSS
0.4%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
Higher than 30% of all CVEs
Exploitation Status
No known exploitation
Sophistication
N/A

What is the attack surface?

AV AC PR UI S C I A
AV Network
AC Low
PR None
UI None
S Unchanged
C None
I None
A High

What should I do?

No patch available

Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.

Which compliance frameworks are affected?

Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-92983?

InternLM LMDeploy through 0.17.0 in DistServe prefill/decode disaggregation mode fails to release scheduler sessions because the proxy uses user-facing session IDs instead of internal scheduler keys. Unauthenticated attackers can send completion requests to the proxy endpoint that accumulate unreleased scheduler metadata and memory until the prefill worker is out-of-memory killed.

Is CVE-2026-92983 actively exploited?

No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-92983 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.

How to fix CVE-2026-92983?

No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-92983?

CVE-2026-92983 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH). The EPSS exploitation probability is 0.37%.

What are the technical details?

Original Advisory

InternLM LMDeploy through 0.17.0 in DistServe prefill/decode disaggregation mode fails to release scheduler sessions because the proxy uses user-facing session IDs instead of internal scheduler keys. Unauthenticated attackers can send completion requests to the proxy endpoint that accumulate unreleased scheduler metadata and memory until the prefill worker is out-of-memory killed.

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-772 — Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime: The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.

  • [Requirements] Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, languages such as Java, Ruby, and Lisp perform automatic garbage collection that releases memory for objects that have been deallocated.
  • [Implementation] It is good practice to be responsible for freeing all resources you allocate and to be consistent with how and where you free resources in a function. If you allocate resources that you intend to free upon completion of the function, you must be sure to free the resources at all exit points for that function including error conditions.

Source: MITRE CWE corpus.

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Timeline

Published
September 17, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
First Seen
September 17, 2026