CVE-2026-95619
HIGHA flaw was found in libstdc++. An integer overflow can occur when processing large inputs to the aligned operator new in the C++ library. This vulnerability could lead to an undersized memory allocation, potentially causing memory corruption or application...
Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.
What systems are affected?
How severe is it?
What is the attack surface?
What should I do?
No patch available
Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-95619?
A flaw was found in libstdc++. An integer overflow can occur when processing large inputs to the aligned operator new in the C++ library. This vulnerability could lead to an undersized memory allocation, potentially causing memory corruption or application instability.
Is CVE-2026-95619 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-95619 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2026-95619?
No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-95619?
CVE-2026-95619 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.7 (HIGH).
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
A flaw was found in libstdc++. An integer overflow can occur when processing large inputs to the aligned operator new in the C++ library. This vulnerability could lead to an undersized memory allocation, potentially causing memory corruption or application instability.
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-190 — Integer Overflow or Wraparound: The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
- [Requirements] Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
- [Requirements] Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Source: MITRE CWE corpus.
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:HReferences
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:58503vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67275vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:89830vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-95619vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgiissue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT
Timeline
Related Vulnerabilities
CVE-2025-1537910.0MLflow: RCE via unsanitized model dependency specs
Same package: mlflowCVE-2023-376510.0MLflow: path traversal allows arbitrary file read
Same package: mlflowCVE-2023-27809.8MLflow: path traversal allows arbitrary file read/write
Same package: mlflowCVE-2023-11779.8MLflow: path traversal allows arbitrary file read/write
Same package: mlflowCVE-2026-26359.8mlflow: security flaw enables exploitation
Same package: mlflow