AI Component

Training Data

Training data is both the model's most valuable input and its most underprotected one. Three problem classes dominate. First, poisoning: an attacker who can influence a public dataset, a web crawl, or a fine-tuning corpus can plant backdoors or biases that survive into the deployed model — BadNets-style attacks on image classifiers, trigger-phrase attacks on LLMs, and reward-hacking on RLHF datasets. Second, memorization and leakage: models can regurgitate verbatim training data, exposing PII and copyrighted content; this has driven the active New York Times v. OpenAI litigation and is a recurring GDPR concern. Third, provenance: when training data origins are unclear, downstream users inherit legal and security risk they can't assess. EU AI Act Article 10 (Data Governance) and ISO 42001 Annex A treat training-data quality as a controlled asset. Defenses: data lineage tracking, deduplication, PII scrubbing before training, and adversarial training against known trigger families.

228
Total CVEs
12
Pages
Page 12 of 12
Current
Severity CVE CVSS
HIGH GHSA-rghg-q7wp-9767 -
HIGH GHSA-qxq5-qhx6-94qw 7.8
UNKNOWN CVE-2026-49431 -
HIGH GHSA-p77j-g7h5-r2vw -
HIGH CVE-2026-76336 7.1
HIGH CVE-2026-76254 7.5
MEDIUM CVE-2026-76341 5.4
UNKNOWN CVE-2026-18286 -

Page 12 of 12