AI Component

Training Data

Training data is both the model's most valuable input and its most underprotected one. Three problem classes dominate. First, poisoning: an attacker who can influence a public dataset, a web crawl, or a fine-tuning corpus can plant backdoors or biases that survive into the deployed model — BadNets-style attacks on image classifiers, trigger-phrase attacks on LLMs, and reward-hacking on RLHF datasets. Second, memorization and leakage: models can regurgitate verbatim training data, exposing PII and copyrighted content; this has driven the active New York Times v. OpenAI litigation and is a recurring GDPR concern. Third, provenance: when training data origins are unclear, downstream users inherit legal and security risk they can't assess. EU AI Act Article 10 (Data Governance) and ISO 42001 Annex A treat training-data quality as a controlled asset. Defenses: data lineage tracking, deduplication, PII scrubbing before training, and adversarial training against known trigger families.

196
Total CVEs
10
Pages
Page 5 of 10
Current
Severity CVE CVSS
LOW CVE-2025-4287 3.3
MEDIUM CVE-2025-46152 5.3
MEDIUM CVE-2025-46153 5.3
MEDIUM CVE-2025-53621 6.9
HIGH CVE-2024-34072 7.8
HIGH CVE-2025-6921 7.5
CRITICAL CVE-2025-62608 9.1
HIGH CVE-2022-0736 7.5
CRITICAL CVE-2023-1177 9.8
HIGH CVE-2023-30172 7.5
CRITICAL CVE-2023-2780 9.8
CRITICAL CVE-2023-3765 10.0
HIGH CVE-2023-4033 7.8
HIGH CVE-2023-6015 7.5
CRITICAL CVE-2023-6018 9.8
CRITICAL CVE-2023-6014 9.8
HIGH CVE-2023-43472 7.5
HIGH CVE-2023-6709 8.8
HIGH CVE-2023-6753 8.8
HIGH CVE-2023-6831 8.1

Page 5 of 10