ToolMEDIUM relevance

LEANGUARD: Lean-Verified Guardrails for Tool-Using Agents

Sreehari SankarDebargha GangulyVikash SinghMohsen HaririWeicong ChenYanyan ZhangShouren WangWang YangChaoda SongAlexander NemecekOsama ZafarIdan DavidovichYuting ShaoKai YeBiyao ZhangXinpeng LiJoe StubbsErman AydayJing MaVipin Chaudhary
Published
November 2, 2026
Updated
November 2, 2026

Abstract

Tool-using language-model agents often execute actions that their domain policies forbid. We present LeanGuard, a runtime that checks every proposed tool call against a policy written in Lean4 before the call reaches the environment. Policies combine state predicates with scoped past-time temporal operators over the execution history, evaluation is fail-closed, and the decision procedure is proved equivalent to a LeanLTL semantics. A denied call can be corrected in two ways. With feedback, the agent receives the violated rule and a hint; with proof-guided repair, Lean metaprogramming searches for a nearby call that preserves the user's intent and proves that the policy admits it, without the model. On Tau-Bench with five Qwen models (0.8B-27B), unguarded agents execute at least 33 calls that the Lean policy forbids, while LeanGuard executes none; with feedback, task success does not change significantly. On DTap, LeanGuard reduces direct prompt-injection success from 57.9% to 5.9%, and in telecom, where benign tasks need no writes, benign success is unchanged. Feedback reduces repeated blocked calls and raises task success for four of five models over a bare denial. On replayed denials, repair proves an admissible edit for 88 of 252 denials caused by argument values, in a median of 2,ms.

Pro Analysis

Full threat analysis, ATLAS technique mapping, compliance impact assessment (ISO 42001, EU AI Act), and actionable recommendations are available with a Pro subscription.

Threat Deep-Dive
ATLAS Mapping
Compliance Reports
Actionable Recommendations
Start 14-Day Free Trial