CVE-2026-18393: vLLM — MEDIUM

A flaw was found in FFmpeg. The tdsc_load_cursor() function writes beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer when processing crafted TDSC cursor data. A remote attacker could exploit this by supplying a specially crafted video file, potentially leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code...

Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.

What systems are affected?

Package	Ecosystem	Vulnerable Range	Patched
vLLM	pip	—	No patch
89.7K 128 dependents Pushed 5d ago 24% patched ~54d to patch Full package profile →
ffmpeg	—	—	No patch

How severe is it?

CVSS 3.1

5.4 / 10

EPSS

N/A

Exploitation Status

No known exploitation

Sophistication

N/A

What is the attack surface?

AV Adjacent

AC High

PR None

UI Required

S Unchanged

C None

I Low

A High

What should I do?

No patch available

Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.

Which compliance frameworks are affected?

Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-18393?

A flaw was found in FFmpeg. The tdsc_load_cursor() function writes beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer when processing crafted TDSC cursor data. A remote attacker could exploit this by supplying a specially crafted video file, potentially leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

Is CVE-2026-18393 actively exploited?

No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-18393 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.

How to fix CVE-2026-18393?

No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-18393?

CVE-2026-18393 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.4 (MEDIUM).

What are the technical details?

Original Advisory

A flaw was found in FFmpeg. The tdsc_load_cursor() function writes beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer when processing crafted TDSC cursor data. A remote attacker could exploit this by supplying a specially crafted video file, potentially leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write

CWE-787 — Out-of-bounds Write: The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

[Requirements] Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
[Architecture and Design] Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

Source: MITRE CWE corpus.