CVE-2026-59221
HIGHOpen WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.6 before 0.10.0, _sanitize_proxy_path in backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py decoded proxy paths only eight times, allowing a nine-times percent-encoded ../ traversal value to pass normalization...
Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.
What systems are affected?
| Package | Ecosystem | Vulnerable Range | Patched |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open WebUI | pip | — | No patch |
Do you use Open WebUI? You're affected.
How severe is it?
What is the attack surface?
What should I do?
No patch available
Monitor for updates. Consider compensating controls or temporary mitigations.
Which compliance frameworks are affected?
Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-59221?
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.6 before 0.10.0, _sanitize_proxy_path in backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py decoded proxy paths only eight times, allowing a nine-times percent-encoded ../ traversal value to pass normalization checks and be decoded by the upstream terminal server. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
Is CVE-2026-59221 actively exploited?
No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-59221 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.
How to fix CVE-2026-59221?
No patch is currently available. Monitor vendor advisories for updates.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-59221?
CVE-2026-59221 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.7 (HIGH).
What are the technical details?
Original Advisory
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.6 before 0.10.0, _sanitize_proxy_path in backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py decoded proxy paths only eight times, allowing a nine-times percent-encoded ../ traversal value to pass normalization checks and be decoded by the upstream terminal server. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) CWE-22 — Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'): The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
- [Implementation] Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylis
- [Architecture and Design] For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Source: MITRE CWE corpus.
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N References
- github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/05098d25a58d03738e01c4e85e8852c3b4ad849c x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/26050 x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.10.0 x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-frvj-c5qp-xj4w x_refsource_CONFIRM
Timeline
Related Vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-44551 9.1 open-webui: LDAP auth bypass — full account takeover
Same package: open-webui CVE-2026-45672 8.8 open-webui: code exec gate bypass via API endpoint
Same package: open-webui CVE-2026-44552 8.7 open-webui: Redis cache poisoning enables cross-instance tool hijack
Same package: open-webui CVE-2025-64495 8.7 Open WebUI: XSS-to-RCE via malicious prompt injection
Same package: open-webui CVE-2026-45315 8.7 open-webui: stored XSS → JWT theft and admin takeover
Same package: open-webui