AI Component

Training Data

Training data is both the model's most valuable input and its most underprotected one. Three problem classes dominate. First, poisoning: an attacker who can influence a public dataset, a web crawl, or a fine-tuning corpus can plant backdoors or biases that survive into the deployed model — BadNets-style attacks on image classifiers, trigger-phrase attacks on LLMs, and reward-hacking on RLHF datasets. Second, memorization and leakage: models can regurgitate verbatim training data, exposing PII and copyrighted content; this has driven the active New York Times v. OpenAI litigation and is a recurring GDPR concern. Third, provenance: when training data origins are unclear, downstream users inherit legal and security risk they can't assess. EU AI Act Article 10 (Data Governance) and ISO 42001 Annex A treat training-data quality as a controlled asset. Defenses: data lineage tracking, deduplication, PII scrubbing before training, and adversarial training against known trigger families.

196
Total CVEs
10
Pages
Page 10 of 10
Current
Severity CVE CVSS
HIGH CVE-2026-11816 8.1
CRITICAL CVE-2026-48797 -
CRITICAL CVE-2025-71321 9.8
HIGH CVE-2025-71376 8.1
HIGH CVE-2026-52812 -
CRITICAL CVE-2026-56445 9.1
HIGH CVE-2026-58116 8.8
HIGH CVE-2025-71350 8.1
UNKNOWN CVE-2026-12480 -
HIGH CVE-2026-57516 8.8
UNKNOWN CVE-2026-8387 -
CRITICAL CVE-2026-23537 9.1
HIGH CVE-2026-56209 7.1
HIGH CVE-2026-14535 8.8
MEDIUM CVE-2026-55438 5.8
HIGH CVE-2026-55075 7.4

Page 10 of 10